Technical SEO that gets implemented
I audit what Google actually sees (indexation, Core Web Vitals, schema, headings and internal linking) then fix it, rather than handing you a report and an invoice. Pricing is by page count: $60 for one page, $230 for up to ten, $450 for up to twenty-five. You can check the standard by running this domain through PageSpeed Insights.
Check it yourself
This page is the portfolio
Most SEO pages ask you to trust a claim. This one doesn't need you to. Put tanvirtusher.com into PageSpeed Insights and look at the score.
It's a static site with no render-blocking JavaScript, self-hosted subsetted fonts, responsive WebP images with explicit dimensions, immutable caching on hashed assets, and schema on every page. Nothing exotic, just every decision made in the direction of the thing being measured.
That is the standard your site gets held to. It is also the fastest way to judge whether I know what I'm talking about, and it takes about thirty seconds.
The four changes that took this site to 100/100, with the exact settings and the before-and-after numbers, are written up in how this site reached a 100/100 speed score.
The audit
What actually gets checked
Written against current guidance, not habit. INP replaced FID as a Core Web Vital in March 2024, and FAQ rich results were retired in May 2026, so neither gets sold to you as something it no longer is.
-
Can Google reach it?
- robots.txt and meta robots: blocking what you meant to block, nothing else
- Indexation: what is indexed, what is excluded, and why
- Canonical tags: absolute, self-referencing, no contradictions
- XML sitemap valid, current, and declared
- Redirect chains and orphan pages
-
Core Web Vitals
- LCP: what the largest paint actually is, and why it is late
- INP: interaction responsiveness (replaced FID in March 2024)
- CLS: layout shift from fonts, images and injected content
- Render-blocking CSS and JavaScript
- Image formats, sizing and lazy-loading below the fold
-
On-page structure
- Titles and meta descriptions: unique, in range, written to earn a click
- One H1 per page and a heading hierarchy that reflects the content
- Image alt text where it carries meaning
- Internal linking, and whether authority reaches the pages that matter
-
Structured data
- Schema present, valid, and matching what is visible on the page
- Deprecated types flagged and removed
- Breadcrumbs, Organization and Person markup where they apply
- Open Graph and Twitter cards that render correctly when shared
Process
How an audit runs
Order matters here. Fixing on-page copy before the page can be crawled is work nobody will ever see.
- 01
Crawl and measure first
What Google can reach, what it has indexed, and what the real Core Web Vitals are. Field data where it exists, lab data where it doesn't. No opinions yet.
- 02
Fix crawling and indexation
Robots rules, canonicals, redirect chains, orphan pages. Nothing else matters until the pages you care about can be reached and are eligible to appear.
- 03
Then speed, then structure
Render-blocking resources, image formats and sizing, layout shift, and the LCP element itself, followed by titles, descriptions, headings and schema.
- 04
Verify and hand over
Re-run PageSpeed and the Rich Results Test, confirm the fixes are live, and write down what changed and why. If you have Search Console, I'll show you which reports to watch and what a normal recovery curve looks like.
Pricing
Priced by how much of the site you want covered
Most sites need the ten-page tier: home, main service pages, about, contact, and whichever pages already bring traffic worth protecting.
-
Basic
$60
On-page SEO for your homepage
- Title optimization
- H1, H2, H3 tags
- Meta description
1 page, 5 keywords · 5 days, rush +$40
-
Most sites
Standard
$230
On-page SEO for up to 10 pages
- Title optimization
- H1, H2, H3 tags
- Meta description
- Image alt tags
- Schema markup
- Page audit
10 pages, 10 keywords · 5 days, rush +$70
-
Premium
$450
On-page SEO for up to 25 pages
- Title optimization
- H1, H2, H3 tags
- Meta description
- Image alt tags
- Schema markup
- Page audit
25 pages, 25 keywords · 7 days, rush +$100
Where this comes from
Fourteen years of building the things being audited
Most SEO consultants can tell you a page is slow. Fewer can open the template and make it fast. I have spent fourteen years building sites: five of them shipping restaurant websites at volume on a CodeIgniter platform, two as a team lead on commerce systems, and the last three building SMM panels. The recommendation and the implementation come from the same person.
That matters more than it sounds. The gap where most SEO work dies is between the audit and the developer who has to action it: a list of forty items arrives, the developer disagrees with half of them, and nothing ships. If I am doing both, that gap does not exist.
SEO work has covered restaurant platforms, commerce sites and marketing agencies, alongside the panel work, including spotylab.it, named publicly by the client in their own review.
Thanks Tusher for your amazing work! You made my spotylab.it looks so good!
Questions
What clients ask before booking an audit
What do I actually receive?
A prioritised list of what is wrong, with the fix for each, and then the fixes implemented rather than just documented. A 60-page PDF you have to hire someone else to action is not an outcome.
How is this priced?
By page count. One page is $60, up to ten is $230, up to twenty-five is $450. Most sites need the ten-page tier: home, main services, about, contact, and whichever pages actually bring traffic.
Can you guarantee I will rank?
No, and be careful of anyone who does. Technical SEO removes the reasons Google cannot rank you. It does not manufacture demand for what you sell. What I can show you is measurable before-and-after on indexation, Core Web Vitals and schema validity.
How long until it shows in Search Console?
Technical fixes are visible to Google within days of recrawl. Ranking movement realistically takes two to three months, and longer in competitive markets. The Core Web Vitals improvements you can measure the same day.
Do you work on WordPress and WooCommerce?
Yes. WordPress, WooCommerce, Laravel, CodeIgniter and custom PHP are all familiar, and being able to edit the theme rather than only advise on it is the difference between a report and a result.
What if my site is on a platform you cannot edit?
Then I will tell you before you pay. On locked platforms I can still do titles, descriptions, headings, schema and image work, but not template-level speed fixes. I would rather scope that honestly than take the money.
Is a faster site really worth it?
Core Web Vitals are a ranking signal, but the bigger effect is on conversion. People leave slow pages before they load. That matters whether or not Google is watching.
How do I know you can actually do this?
Run this domain through PageSpeed Insights and look at the score. That is the standard the work is held to, and it is checkable in thirty seconds without asking me anything.
Also
If your site is an SMM panel
Panels have their own failure modes: hundreds of near-duplicate service pages, an order form rendered before any readable content. They need a different page.
Send me the URL
I'll tell you the three things costing you most before you pay anything. If the honest answer is that your site is fine and the problem is elsewhere, I'll say that too.